New York Safe Act Lawsuit

IT HAS A CASE# !!!
Leaming, et al. v. Sampson, et al. --- district court of the United States, western district of Washington: 2:23-cv-00333-RAJ --- CLAIM(s) FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF /REMEDY(s) AND FOR AGREED PUNITIVE DAMAGES ON REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE (Common-Law) RECORD ... and they're stuck - limited to the FACTS appearing in the ADMINISTRATIVE (Common-Law) Record & JUDGMENT !!! The complete Administrative /Common-Law Record & JUDGMENT is entered as EXHIBIT !!!
NO EXCEPTIONS TO 2ND AMENDMENT, ETC.,
email Infamous Keny ( infamous.keny.01@gmail.com ) for copies of process   !!!

Why don't we appoint our own Sheriffs after all the thoses positions are vacated. The public officals are all commerical and can not hold true office.

MEMORANDUM OF LAWIn Support of Montana Code AnnotatedTitle 46, Chapter 22, Part 1, § 46-22-101
COMES NOW THE PETITIONER,__________________________________________________________
who is unschooled in law and speaks only in guttural vernacular to apply his right to the Writ of Habeas Corpus to inquire as to the Nature and Cause of His detention in, _________________________________________________
1.  No meaningful hearing before a Court of Record has occurred prior to  incarceration.
2.  No explanation of the Nature of the Action has been explained to petitioner prior to incarceration.
3.  No explanation of the Cause of Action has been explained to petitioner prior to incarceration.
4.  No assistance of Counsel was afforded petitioner.
5.  Subject Matter Jurisdiction was not established prior to incarceration.
6.  This petitioner demands immediate implementation of this Writ.
7.  All findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding this Writ shall be in  writing.
      Respectfully submitted
 
Date: _______________________ ____________________________________
 

But if the People don't know how to have government by consent as Thomas Jefferson declare in the Declaration of Independance then you can not control your government and you can not have Liberty.

The recent dismissal in the Federal SAFE Act case was akin to letting the air out of our sales, but it also is a wake-up call. Setting aside the blatant contempt of the Law, we all can see now that the rights guaranteed by the Constitution are being whittled away.  First victim was the states with the fraudulent 17th Amend. Then they work their way down the line, due process, trial by jury… basically put on the shelf. Next victim, the Fourth Amendment supposedly doing searches on cars out on the road without any Authority. Let’s not even say the word ‘FISA Court’.
Now we get to the real meat and potatoes, we go to court over the Second Amendment, and they do the expected thing, conceal, obfuscate, basically borderline treason. But let's not talk about treason, let's talk about what's next.
The recent decision only means that now they've moved up to the first one, free speech et al. Our servants will not give us an Art. III court. Apparently they don’t trust the People to make sound decisions. This must not be allowed to stand. I can only say to those that are getting cold feet or maybe think that this has been a waste of time, NOT!
Now's the Time to Double Down with No Resolve by telling your gun totin’ friends and also the people that own pens and pencils because it looks like they're next. Facebook and others are taking the 1st. Amend. out behind the shed to have a serious talking to with those who would question others. With no 2nd Amend to defend them- Checkmate!
So I ask for everyone to consider their rights and responsibilities at this very important juncture in our quest to restore what we always thought we had.

well, can we do something about the imprisonment etc do protests ... protest to DOJ. Couls someion  maybe make it clearer to me how he can be in prison in the first place w/o proven guilt?? am I getting this wrong??  I called my senator....they do the same kind of imprisonment and other intimidations tactics and we in NLA are probably familiar with   this kind of stuff......  Can we do something?? I missed the calls this week..
 

What happened at the June 19th hearing?

recently, my son was stopped in Georgia for a missing missing license plate sticker of which he has the registration. When the cop handed him a form to sign, as cop had written a citation, my son asked what if anything would happen if he didn’t sign it. The cop told him that he would have to be made to go with him to the police department and be detained 4-5 hours...This was in Pooler, Georgia! I followed up with an email to the Pooler Police Chief. needless to say, he has not answered my email.

Anyone see this, Asm Dipietro on the  New York Assembly floor 3,2 million forthe NY Safe act and Cuomo's secret police force?Is this not in your face Treason.Could we not get a Grand Jury investigation on this?
https://vimeo.com/262714602

Possible scenario for why taking away guns from civilians won’t work.
 
We hear all the time about how certain groups of people want to take away the guns from American civilians to avoid shootings like what has been happening in the past few years. Ok, let’s pretend it did happen and now only law enforcement has guns, and no civilians can possess a firearm of any kind. Aside from being able to protect ourselves from immediate intruders to our homes to which no 911 call is going to get law enforcement there fast enough to handle the situation, let’s take something else into consideration.
A small town of say 5000 might have how many officers on duty at any given time, maybe 10? That’s probably close enough for this scenario to consider. Now, with that allocation of officers and any one of them could be just like a “normal” American citizen assigned to help protect all of the other 4990 citizens for an 8 or 12 hour shift, what happens when one of those goes berserk for whatever reason and starts killing everyone around him because he KNOWS they don’t have any guns and can’t defend themselves? The other officers come to save the day? Nope, they all trusted one another and he has systematically shot them all in the back at various locations he called them to. No one knows what he is doing.
The nearest town from there is say, 50 miles. A citizen hears gunfire, calls the police and no one answers. They call the nearest town police, and at 50 miles away, how long do you think it’s going to take for help to arrive? How many bullets will be shot by that time? How many people will die because they had their weapons taken away from them?
There is absolutely no guarantee that when the guns are taken away from civilians that something like this or similar won’t happen. Not only is it ILLEGAL to prevent people from being able to protect themselves, it is morally unacceptable. If a common everyday citizen can go nuts and shoot up a movie theatre, then what’s to say a police officer would not do that too? There isn’t any guarantee such a thing would not happen. There are far too many bad police officers vs good ones to justify any sort of gun control that prevents citizens from protecting themselves.
The scenario presented here could happen on any scale, whether it’s a small town or a big one, one officer or a group of rogue officers, and it would be like shooting fish in a barrel.
All of us have the unalienable right to protect ourselves with any means necessary.
We also have the constitutional right to protect ourselves which includes the right to keep and bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.
Just to clarify what was just said, let’s define the word infringe…
in·fringe
verb
past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed
actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms:       contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of; disregard, ignore, neglect; go beyond, overstep, exceed; infract
"the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights"
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
"his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms:       restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; undermine, erode, diminish, weaken, impair, damage, compromise
"the surveillance infringed on his rights"
 
Guess what that means?
That means you cannot limit any action of a person who is attempting to gain a firearm for their own protection. You cannot remove any firearm from the possession of a person. It has no bearing on any type of firearm as well. If there are any laws, statutes or regulations that violate the second amendment, they are illegal.
 

"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." - Thomas Jefferson

"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." - John Adams

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

"The First Amendment has created a wall of separation between the church and the State. But that wall is one directional. It is to keep the government from running the Church. But it is not to keep Christian principles out of the government." - Thomas Jefferson

Americans for America – National 2nd Amendment Rights Rally at All State Capitols
2nd Amendment Rallies at All State Capitols Saturday April 14.
For more info:
https://www.oathkeepers.org/2nd-amendment-rallies-state-capitols-saturda...

Hey Guys, I am being inundated with questions about the date for the filing of injunction re" Re-Cert of CCW Permits.

I would be interested in the stats.I don't have your contact info.Could you post them here?If as few people are re certifiying as i suspect i believe they will extend the deadline or some other safe face action.I know there is a state senator that introduced a bill for extention.(so she says)

Is there a time frame  or date for acting on this lawsuit yet?Is there any information out there on how many gun owners have not re-certified yet?