NEW WORLD ORDER

We Are Opposed Around The World By A
Monolithic And Ruthless Conspiracy - JFK

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (administrations), too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan of reducing us to slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson

“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.” ― J. Edgar Hoover, Masters Of Deceit: The Story Of Communism In America And How To Fight It.

We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence. – JFK

NEW WORLD ORDER QUOTES

1986 - Regarding “the establishment” (NWO) of which George Bush was a member, a book was written about some of its leaders and was titled The Wise Men (1986). It was co-authored by Rhodes Scholar, CFR member, and a Time editor, Walter Isaacson, who described how 6 leaders “shaped a new world order,” were internationalists, and had a “common outlook.” One of them, Chip Bohlen, was quoted as saying about socialism: “maybe that is the road we ought to go down.” Also in the book one reads that Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. in 1965 wrote: “The New York financial and legal community was the heart of the American establishment....its front organizations, the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations.”

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” PRES WOODROW WILSON, the New Freedom (1913)

1995 - July/August: In the CFR's Foreign Affairs, prominent CFR member Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. exclaims: “We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” ARTHUR MEIER SCHLESINGER, JR

“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1,1992.

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” DR. HENRY KISSINGER; Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.” HENRY KISSINGER; in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975

“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.” BRENT SCOWCROFT (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

“We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans...” BILL CLINTON (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER

“... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people - will hate the new world order - and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful looking people.” H. G. WELLS, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939).

“Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” SARA BRADY, Chairman, Handgun Control, to Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. THE SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN CHINA under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER, statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)

“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period.” RICHARD GEPHARDT, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long.” PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH (January 1991)

“... There is no such thing in America as an independent press ... We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes... Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” JOHN SWINTON, former New York Times Chief of Staff

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order.” HENRY KISSINGER” How to Achieve The New World Order” Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” Article by SEN. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system....a first step toward a new world order.” HENRY KISSINGER 1993 - July 18: CFR member and Tri-lateralist writes in The Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” CONGRESSMAN LARRY P. MCDONALD, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

“The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [Marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.” MYRON FAGAN

“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994.

“A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.” BRENT SCOWCROFT, George Bush's National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War.

“The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)...Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.” PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, September 11, 1990.

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” DAVID SPANGLER, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988.

“...In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” RICHARD N. GARDNER, in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press ... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers; An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.” U.S. CONGRESSMAN OSCAR CALLAWAY, 1917

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations ofmankind.” GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” STROBE TALBOT, Pres. Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member JAMES WARBURG to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy... would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” PAUL EHRLICH, Stanford University

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The Western world will need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, STUPID AND DECADENT, will rejoice to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon AS THEIR GUARD IS DOWN, WE SHALL SMASH THEM WITH OUR CLENCHED FIST.” DMITRII Z. MANUILSKII  (Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931)

“Christianity is our foe. If animal rights are to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” PETER SINGER, the “Father of Animal Rights”

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” NORMAN THOMAS, former U.S. Socialist Presidential Candidate

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day.” DR. JACQUES COUSTEAU

“I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” JOHN DAVIS, editor of Earth First! Journal

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” BENJAMIN DISRAELI, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans.” BRITISH PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN DISRAELI, 1876

“What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR EDITORIAL, June 19th, l920

“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.” NEW YORK CITY MAYOR JOHN F. HYLAN, 1922

“From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” WINSTON CHURCHILL, stated to the London Press, in l922.

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.” PROFESSOR ARNOLD TOYNBEE, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

“The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi-occult power which....pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.” British military historian MAJOR GENERAL J.F.C. FULLER, l941

“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support… “The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.… “The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” CURTIS DALL, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.” SUPREME COURT JUSTICE FELIX FRANKFURTER, 1952

“Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure.” JOSEPH KENNEDY, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

“Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite.” SENATOR WILLIAM JENNER, 1954

“The case for government by elites is irrefutable.” SENATOR WILLIAM FULBRIGHT, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?

“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” U.S. SENATOR BARRY GOLDWATER in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.” Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) PROFESSOR CARROLL QUIGLEY of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, WILLIAM JEFFERSON BLY THE CLINTON.

“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.” FORMER CONGRESSMAN JOHN RARICK 1971

“The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation.” THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, September 1, l961

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” CFR member RICHARD GARDNER, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.

“The planning of UN can be traced to the 'secret steering committee' established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department's Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department's postwar planning.” PROFESSORS LAURENCE H. SHOUP AND WILLIAM MINTER, writing in their study of the CFR, “Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.” (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.” HARPERS, July l958

“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” M. C. ALEXANDER, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.” DR. AUGUSTUS O. THOMAS, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

“... When the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” H. G. WELLS, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.” Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in GENERAL CONVENTION (October 1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace.'” Excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in The NEW YORK TIMES (October 1940)

“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.” THE DECLARATION OF THE FEDERATION OF THE WORLD, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go”, Declares NOTRE DAME PROFESSOR Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.” Text of article in The PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER (June 1942)

“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.” American INSTITUTE OF JUDAISM, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.” NORMAN THOMAS, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.” Excerpt from article by RALPH W. PAGE in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944) “Alchemy for a New World Order” Article by STEPHEN JOHN STEDMAN in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able-to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'“ GOV. NELSON ROCKEFELLER of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” -- The New York Times (February 1962)

“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.” RICHARD NIXON, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967) “He [PRESIDENT NIXON] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order.'“ Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case by case basis... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” RICHARD N. GARDNER, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.” RICHARD A. FALK, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order.” Part of article in THE NEW YORK TIMES (November 1975)

“A New World Order” Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.” Excerpt from A. M. ROSENTHAL, in The New York Times (January 1991)

“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.” GEORGE MCGOVERN, in The New York Times (February 1990

“... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.” WILLIAM SAFIRE, in The New York Times (February 1991)

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.” Part of full-page advertisement by THE GOVERNMENT OF MOROCCO in The New York Times (April 1994)

“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” Title of article by KENICHI OHMAE, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

“The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.” NELSON MANDELA, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

“The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.” PRESIDENT HOSNI MUBARAK OF EGYPT, in The New York Times (April 1995)

“...This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government'....National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept...” ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.

“...This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.” SENATOR JOSEPH S. CLARK speaking on the floor of the Senate, March 1, 1962, about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever.

“Let me control a peoples currency and I care not who makes their laws...” MEYER NATHANIEL ROTHCHILD in a speech to a gathering of world bankers February 12, 1912.The following year, we subscribed to the “services” of the newly incorporated Federal Reserve, headed by Mr. Rothchild.

“By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations ... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable.” POPE JOHN PAUL II quoted by Malachi Martin in the book “The Keys of This Blood”

“The New World Order is a world that has a super national authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and Communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order.” Former West German Chancellor, WILLY BRANDT, former chairman of the Fifth-Socialist International, who chaired the Brandt Commission in the late 1980s.

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991.

“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans... and so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities.” PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, 3-22-94, MTV's “Enough is Enough”

“The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.” H. J. Res. 438 Introduced by REP. MAJOR OWENS, 1992

“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.” CHARLES AUSTIN BEARD (1874-1948)

“There is no reason for anyone in this country, anyone except a police officer or a military person, to buy, to own, to have, to use a handgun....And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution.” MICHAEL GARTNER, 1992 in USA Today Vice President Al Gore as he traveled to Marrakech, Morocco, in April for the signing of the new world trade agreement. Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied 'no fly' zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down two U.S. helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. 'I want to extend

condolences,' GORE SAID, 'to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations.'“ (Los Angeles Times, 6/12/94)

“There is nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine... been here 4 1/2 billion years. We've been here, what, a 100,000 years, maybe 200,000. And we've only been engaged in heavy industry a little over 200 years. 200 years versus 4 1/2 billion. And we have the conceit to think that somehow we're a threat? The planet isn't going away. We are.” GEORGE CARLIN

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” THOMAS JEFFERSON

“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. MENCKEN

“Nuclear power must be dealt with irrationally. ... Nuclear plants are carcinogens. Let's get that story out. ... Their lies will catch up to them. We need endless Chernobyl reminders.” RALPH NADER

Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” LYALL WATSON, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995

“'Protecting the Environment' is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature.” J. H. ROBBINS

“...the only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don't suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them.” MICHAEL OPPENHEIMER, Environmental Defense Fund

“The necessary consequence of an egalitarian program is the decidedly in egalitarian creation of a ruthless power elite.” M. N. ROTHBARD Global Sustainability requires: “the deliberate quest of poverty ... reduced resource consumption ... and set levels of mortality control.” PROFESSOR MAURICE KING

“Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweighs the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community.” JANET HATHAWAY, Natural Resources Defense Council

The Environmentalist's Dream is an Egalitarian Society based on: rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally. AARON WILDAVSKY

“A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” RICHARD BENEDICT, State Dept. employee working on assignment from the Conservation Foundation

“The secret to David McTaggart's (early officer in Greenpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace's success: It doesn't matter what is true . ... it only matters what people believe is true  ... You are what the media define you to be. [Greenpeace] became a myth, and a myth-generating machine.” PAUL WATSON, co-founder of Greenpeace

“... a year is about one-fifth of the time we have left if we are going to preserve any kind of quality in our world.” GARRETT DE BELL (1970)

“The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency.” POPE JOHN PAUL I

“The move toward controlling less and less pollution at greater and greater expense -- until you are spending everything to control nothing -- is one of the big water quality problems we are facing in the future.” ERNEST ROSENBERG

“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover the source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.” AMORY LOVINS, Rocky Mountain Institute

“... the Planning Commission must say 'no' to development ... Austin, Texas, is showing us about land use ... “ JUDGE ARMSTRONG, Kentucky County

“It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost.” M. N. ROTHBARD

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” JOHN DAVIS, editor of Earth First! Journal

“We've got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing -- in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” TIMOTHY WIRTH, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects ... We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land.” DAVID FOREMAN, Earth First!

“... The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.” DR. REED F. NOSS, The Wildlands Project

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.” Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard - member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a UNITED STATES ARMY THINK TANK.

“... as radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution.” MISS ANN THROPY (pseudonym), Earth First! Journal

“The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing ... This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run.” ECONOMIST EDITORIAL

“The invention of the concept of sustainable human development and that of so-called human security, as opposed to territorial security of nation- states, and its promotion by the UN is in clear contradiction to all that we, the Group of 77, and the UN Charter itself consider inalienable, namely national sovereignty and security.” PRANAB MUKHERJEE, India's Minister of Commerce, Earth Times, 15 October 1994

“It's (the prospect of cheap fusion energy) the worst thing that could happen to the planet.” JEREMY RIFKIN

“No case for expensive policies for safeguarding species can be made without more extensive analysis.” Endangered Species Blueprint, NATIONAL WILDERNESS INSTITUTE

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and hence clamorous to be led to safety by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” H. L. MENCKEN

“If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” PRINCE PHILLIP, World Wildlife Fund

“They want timid, helpless people who are anxious to get in touch with their inner child, enter twelve-step programs, and run to the government with every little problem.” CLARK STOOKSBURY

“... Our production and consumption is not sustainable ... Agenda 21 is to be implemented ... The Texas Sustainable Energy Development Council will develop the Texas Plan ... The money will come from milking the utilities and redirecting oil overcharge funds...” COMMISSIONER KARL RABAGO, Texas Public Utilities Commission [Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.]

“Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?” MAURICE STRONG, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

“Behind the honeyed but patently absurd pleas for equality is a ruthless drive for placing 'the new elite' at the top of a new hierachy of power.” M. N. ROTHBARD

“Pure guesswork has become the basis of a forecast that has been published in newspapers to be read and understood as a scientific statement.” Endangered Species Blueprint, NATIONAL WILDERNESS INSTITUTE

“Measured on virtually any scale, the world is in worse shape than it was 20 years ago.” DENNIS HAYES, Chairman of Earth Day 1990

“The world has cancer, and the cancer is man.” A. GREGG, Mankind at the Turning Point

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” CHARLES WURSTER, Environmental Defense Fund

“This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with health and safety.” SHERRY NEDDICK, Greenpeace

“Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process ... Capitalism is destroying the earth.” HELEN CALDICOTT, Union of Concerned Scientists

“The system of private property is the most important guaranty to freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because of the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that no one has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what we do for ourselves.” FRIEDRICH A. HAYCK

“We reject the idea of private property.” PETER BERLE, President of the National Audobon Society

“Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion.” MURRAY ROTHBARD

“No government knows any limits to its power except the endurance of the people.” LYSANDER SPOONER

“The three branches of government ... are not, in any sense, 'branches' since that would imply that there is something they are all attached to besides self-aggrandizement and our pocketbooks.” P. J. O'ROURKE 1915 - Nov 27, Columbia University president NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER (on the executive committee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) delivered an address, “A New World Order is Being Born” to the Union League of Philadelphia in which he stated: “The old world order changed when this war storm broke--the old world order died with the setting of the day's sun and a New World Order is being born while I speak.”

1918 - CHARLES R. VAN HISE, Pres. University of Wisconsin, delivers an address to the Wisconsin State Convention of The League to Enforce Peace. The title of the address is: “The Foundation of a New World Order” in which he says: “The world has become one body, and no great member of it can proceed independently of the other members. They must act together; and this is possible only through formal treaty covenants.”

1919 - The January edition of INTERNATIONAL CONCILIATION (connected with the Carnegie organization) focuses upon “A League of Nations.” A cover letter sent, with this edition of the journal, begins with these words: “The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.”

1919 - A book entitled The New World Order by SAMUEL ZANE BATTEN is published by the American Baptist Publication Society. In this book, Batten declares: “The old order passes from view, the new world rises upon our vision....We have vindicated the right of social control.....There must be developed a national spirit of service....Society must break the stranglehold of capitalism....The natural resources of the nation must be socialized....The state must socialize every group....Men must learn to have a world patriotism. World patriotism must be a faith....There is no more justice for the claim of absolute sovereignty on the part of a

nation than on the part of an individual....The only alternative is World Federation....with a world parliament, and international court, and an international police force....Men must have an international mind before there can be a world federation.

1920 - A book entitled The New World Order (International Organization, International Law, International Cooperation) by Frederick Charles Hicks Doubleday 1920. He is law librarian of Columbia University, and in this book he suggests that among the most powerful few of the Great Powers, the example must be set to “cooperate, here and there, piece by piece, in limiting the exercise of their sovereign rights.”

1927 - The Christian Science Monitor (August 8) quoted from an address to the World Federation of Education Associations (WFEA) by DR. AUGUSTUS THOMAS (commissioner of education for Maine) at their Toronto congress: “If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment.” He says the world must go through a long process of education “...until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.”

1928 - A book entitled The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by socialist H. G. WELLS is published. He declares that “..The political world of the Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments....The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms, it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York....”

1931 - Historian ARNOLD TOYNBEE delivers a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen in which he explains: “We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” --International Affairs (journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, i.e. the British version of the Council on Foreign Relations) Nov 1931, “The Trend of International Affairs Wince the War”

1934 - Experiment In Autobiography by H. G. WELLS is published in which he states: “The organization of this that I call the Open Conspiracy....which will ultimately supply teaching, coercive and directive public services to the whole world, is the immediate task before all rationale people...A planned world-state is appearing at a thousand points....Plans for political synthesis seem to grow bolder and more extensive....There must be a common faith and law for mankind....The main battle is an educational battle.

1940 - A book entitled, The New World Order by H.G. Wells, in which Wells claims: “It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go....We are living in the end of the sovereign states....In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish....Countless people...will hate the new world order....and will die protesting against it.”

1940 - A Book World Order (Civitas Dei) by Lionel Curtis is published. This 985 page volume will be called the foundation of all thought on the design of a new order. It examines human society and concludes that a working system must mean the organization of all human society into one commonwealth.

1942 - In The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 18), reporter William Murphy, Jr. wrote that on June 17, “Undersecretary of State, Sumner Welles called for the early creation of an international organization....the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.”

1948 - July: The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes “A New World Takes Shape” by Sir Harold Butler in which he asks: “How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?....Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape...which may point the way toward the new order.”

1948 - UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy by Fabian Socialist Sir Julian Huxley is published in which he proclaims that UNESCO “...In its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization...”

1949 - April: United Nations World magazine publishes an article by Ambassador Warren Austin, chief of the U.S. Mission to the UN, in which he pronounces that “....World government could not be accepted without radical change of national outlook.... It will take a long time to prepare peoples and governments of most nations for acceptance of and participation in a world government....If we expect this future world government to be created by agreement and not by force or conquest, we will have to be willing to work patiently until peoples or governments are ready for it....

1949 - Towards World Understanding, vol. V, is published by UNESCO, and in this volume one reads: “As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only rather precarious results....For the moment, it is sufficient to note that it is most frequently in the family that the children are infected with nationalism by hearing what is national extolled and what is foreign disparaged....The activity of the school cannot bring about the desired result unless, repudiating every form of nationalism...”

1949 - The New World Order by communist Scott Nearing is published, in which he projects that “the one world of technology must become one world also economically and politically....Such objectives will be achieved most easily through a science of social engineering.”

1951 - July 24: The Chicago Tribune publishes a front page news article titled” 'Global' Flag Gen. Ike's Aim, Says Senator,” which begins with the words: “Gen. Eisenhower is working for an allied army under a single flag, uniform, and command to defend Western Europe, senators reported today on their return from an overseas inspection trip.”

1951 - July 31: The Chicago Tribune publishes an article, “OWI (office of war information) Propaganda machine Linked to Rhodes (Rhodes scholars) Men,” stating: “Those who absorbed the Elmer Davis (Rhodes Scholar and head of OWI), Office of War Information training have pushed the British concept of policing the world with American soldiers and economic aid and have fought for a world federation under which the United States would surrender its sovereignty.” About 40 years later, American soldiers will be stationed in many nations around the world as part of UN peacekeeping missions.

1953 - The Impact of Science on Society by Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell is published in which he declares: “ I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology....Various results will soon be arrived at: that the influence of home is obstructive....although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen....Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such a policy: one is religion; the other is nationalism....A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government.

1959 - The West in Crisis by James Warburg is published, in which he proclaims that: “...a world order without world law is an anachronism....A world which fails to establish the rule of law over the nation-states cannot long continue to exist. We are living in a perilous period of transition from the era of the fully sovereign nation-state to the era of world government.” James Warburg is a CFR member and founder of United World Federalists. He is also the son of Paul Warburg, an architect of the Federal Reserve.

1960 - The United States in the World Arena by Walt Rostow (CFR) is published. In the book he declares: “It is a legitimate American objective to see removed from all nations--including the United States--the right to use substantial military force to pursue their own interest. Since this residual right is the root of national sovereignty and the basis for the existence of an international arena of power, it is, therefore, an American interest to see an end to nationhood as it had been historically defined.”

1961 - Sept, State Department document 7277 titled, “Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete disarmament in a Peaceful World” is published. Pres Kennedy delivers this to the UN on Sept 25. This document provides that the United States will disarm along with other countries so that the UN becomes the unchallengeable World power....disarmament “would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force.” This transition is still going on today.

1962 - March 10 State Department Study Memorandum No. 7, “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, “ written by CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield, in which he states: “A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which “world government” would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions, characterized by mandatory universal membership and some ability to employ physical force....(But) if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government” It looks as if now the “communist menace” has been replaced by the “terrorist menace”. And of course they can switch back to the communist menace or any other kind of menace whenever they want to.

1962 - A lecture given by CFR member Nelson Rockefeller at Harvard University in which he says that there is”...a new and free order struggling to be born....(There is a )fever of nationalism....(but) the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks....These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order....(with)voluntary service...Sooner perhaps than we may realize,....there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”

1967 - March 26: Pope Paul VI writes Populorum Progressio and states: “Who can fail to see the need andimportance of thus gradually coming to the establishment of a world authority capable of taking effective action on the juridical and political planes? Delegates to international organizations, public officials, gentlemen of the press, teachers and educators--all of you must realize that you have your part to play in the construction of a new world order.

1967 - Richard Nixon writing in The CFR periodical Foreign Affairs Oct 1967 “....and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”

1968 - The Subtle and Leisurely Penetration, a reference report from the George Mason School of Correspondence, is published by Education Information, Inc., of Sacramento, CA. It mentions that the thirty-two Americans to be Rhodes Scholars this year have been selected, and then states: “The stated objectives of Cecil John Rhodes and his friend, Sir Andrew Carnegie, included the reduction of the United States to a colony of the New World Order.”

1968 - October: In this edition of the CFR's Foreign Affairs is an article, “Asia After Vietnam,” by Richard Nixon (CFR member 1961-1965), in which he writes of nations' disposition “to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”

1968 - Gov Nelson Rockefeller from Deseret News July 26, 1968, Salt Lake City, Utah pg 2A....”New York Gov Nelson A. Rockefeller says as president he would work toward international creation of “a new world order....”

1970 - Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era by Zbigniew Brzezinski is published. He is a CFR member who will become the first director of the Trilateral Commission and President Carter's national security advisor. In this book he states: “Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief.....Human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable...Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites....whose ties cut across national boundaries....The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty....Further progress will require greater American sacrifices.

1971 - Richard Nixon(CFR) quoted by James Reston(CFR) in Boston Herald Traveller May 21, ......”Aside from politics, Nixon would obviously like to preside over the creation of a new world order,.....”

1972 - Pres Nixon's speech giving in Peking from UPI 2-25-72.......”and the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.....”

1973 - August 10: The New York Times publishes “From a China Traveller” by David Rockefeller, who writes about Communist China: “One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony....There is a very real and pervasive dedication to chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose....The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.”

1974 - Richard N. Gardner writing in Foreign Affairs (CFR) April 1974 Article entitled The Hard Road to World Order, “In short, the “house of world order: will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

1975 - James Reston Sunday Herald Advertiser , Boston Aug 3, 1975......”the spirit of Glassboro under President Johnson was that the big powers should forget the past and work together for a new world order....”

1975 - A Declaration of INTERdependence by Henry Steele Commager Oct 24, 1975.......”Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order.. ..”

1976 - The Freeman Digest (Jan 79) will publish an interview with Joseph Slater, president of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, in which he will respond to the question about “the new world order” as follows: “Whatever system is constructed, many people feel that the new global community will be monolithic; that is why the words “new world order” tend to connote a sort of 1984 Orwellian kind of notion where there is some master system....”

1977 - The Third Try at World Order by Harlan Cleveland, CFR member is published. He calls for “changing Americans' attitudes and institutions”; for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)”; for “fairer distribution of worldly goods through a new International Economic Order”; and for “international standard for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”

1977 - July: The Atlantic Monthly publishes “The Trilateral Connection” by former Washington Post columnist Jeremiah Novak, in which he states: “For the third time in this century, a group of American scholars, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order.”

1979 - Fidel Castro, Associated Press Oct 12 1979 at the United Nations. “Fidel Castro finger waving in the air and angry fist thumping the lectern, demanded a “new world order” and dressed down the United States today for “aggressive” and “exploitative” policies around the world.”

1982 - “Just as there must come a new world economic order, there must come a new world communication order.....It will take time, but it must come.” Christian Century April 14, 1982 p. 442, by William F. Fore.

1988 - George Bush would run for the presidency of the United States in 1988, and on Feb 10, The Washington Post quoted David Rockefeller as remarking that “He's (Bush) one of us ('the establishment')....If he were president, he would be in a better position than anyone else to pull together the people in the country who believe that we are in fact living in one world and have to act that way.”

1988 - Mikhail Gorbachev speaking at UN , The Boston Globe Dec 8 1988 “....He called for a “new world order” founded not on force but on dialogue.......”

1989 - President Bush gave the commencement address at Texas A & M University on May 12, he which he stated “Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order....Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.” --Arizona Daily Star, May 12.

1990 - Mikhail Gorbachev quoted in Washington Post Feb 25 1990 “...A new world order is taking shape so fast that governments are well as private citizens find it difficult just to absorb the gallop of events.....”

1990 - Mikhail Gorbachev speaking at Stanford University quoted by Sentinel wire services Jun 5 1990 “Saying the world should not debate who won the Cold War, Soviet President Mikhail S. Gorbachev called Monday for the United states and Soviet Union to be partners in building “a new world order”....”Tolerance is the alpha and omega of a new world order”....

1991 - May 18 Valley Times, Pleasanton, CA an article entitled “Shevardnadze touts U.N.”, staff writer Jeanie R. Wakeland writes about a speech in San Francisco sponsored by the World Affairs Council: “Shevardnadze said the United nations cannot do anything if its decisions aren't carried out by all members. nations can be made to feel they 'lose' if they go against a U.N. position, Shevardnadze said. 'If we can rely on the (U.N.) position, we can build on this for a new world order.”

1991 - Associated Press June 6, Oslo, Norway: “Mikhail Gorbachev said yesterday in his Nobel Peace lecture that Western failure to heed his call for economic aid could dash hopes for a peaceful new world order.....'To me, it is self-evident that if Soviet perestroika succeeds, there will be a real chance of building a new world order.' “President Bush (SR) quotes on new world order and United nations: “Time and again in this century, the political map of the world was transformed. And in each instance, a new world order came about through the advent of a new tyrant or the outbreak of a bloody global war, or its end.”

Feb 28, 1990---this quote is six months before Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August. “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective--a new world order--can emerge...... We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.” --Sep 11 1990

Pres Bush delivers an address to Congress titled “Toward a New World Order,” regarding the crisis in the Persian Gulf after Iraq invaded Kuwait in August. He will follow this with and October 1 address to the U.N., in which he will speak of the “collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N....a historic movement towards a new world order.” “I think what's at stake here is the new world order....a reinvigorated United Nations.” -Jan 7 1991. “(The Gulf crisis) has to do with a new world order. And that world order is only going to be enhanced if this newly activated peacekeeping function of the United nations proves to be effective.” -Jan 9 1991 “When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.” - Jan 16 1991 A quote from an invitation sent to Republican contributors throughout the United Stated in May 1991: “Now, our President faces greater tasks. And he must have help from like-minded men and women in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate who can help him establish the “new world order” he seeks.”

1992 - July 20 Time magazine published “The Birth of the Global Nation” by Strobe Talbott (Rhodes scholar roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR director, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace board of directors member, and Trilateralist from a wealthy Ohio investment banking family), in which he writes: All countries are basically social arrangements....No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary....Perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all....But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.” 1992 - August 26: The New York Times publishes “The World Needs an Army on Call” by U.S. Senator David Boren (Rhodes Scholar 1963, CFR member, and member of “Skull and Bones”) in which he states: “In the aftermath of World War II, President Truman wanted to empower the United Nations to create a new world order....Richard Gardner proposes that forty to fifty member nations contribute to a rapid-deployment force of one hundred thousand volunteers that could train under common leadership....It is time for us to create such a force....The existence of such a force would go a long way toward making the “new world order” more than just a slogan.”

1993 - Jan 13: Confirmation hearings are held for CFR member Warren Christopher's nomination to be Secretary of State. He and Senator Joseph Biden discuss the possibility of NATO becoming a peacekeeping surrogate for the U.N. “to foster the creation of a new world order.” That is just what happened in Bosnia.

1993 - April 21: General Colin Powell receives the United Nations Association-USA's Global Leadership Award, and he remarks: “The United Nations will spearhead our efforts to manage the new conflicts (that afflict our world)....Yes the principles of the United Nations Charter are worth our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.” !!!!!?????

1993 - May 4: New CFR president Leslie Gelb (formerly and editor at The New York Times ) says on “The Charlie Rose Show” that “...you (Charlie Rose) had me on (before) to talk about the new world order....I talk about it all the time....It's one world now....”

1993 - June 22. In case there is any doubt about whether President Clinton (CFR) supports world government, on this date he signs a letter to the World Federalist Association congratulating Strobe Talbott (CFR) on receiving (June 24) the WFA's first “Norman Cousins Global Governance Award.” The WFA is a leading force for world federal government. Clinton's letter states: “Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government...Strobe Talbott's lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition....He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes....for future success.”

1993 - September 9: Concerning whether U.S. troops should remain in Somalia as part of a U.N. operation, General Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says that a pullout would be “devastating to our hopes for the new world order and our ability to participate in multinational organizations to deal with problems like this.”

1993 - W. Scott Thompson (Rhodes Scholar 1963-66) writes “Conflict and Conflict Resolution: On to the Twenty-First Century” for the federal United Stated Institute of Peace, of which he is a board member appointed by President Reagan in 1986. In this article, Thompson writes about “a positive factor: the greater reliance on (and opportunity for) the United Nations to resolve perennial conflicts....In addition to a strengthened U.N., a New World Order requires understandings and divisions of labor among like-minded friends across the globe.”

1994 - World Federalist Association will publish The Genius of Federation: Why World Federation Is the Answer to Global Problems, which will state: “Let the U.N. establish new agencies such as an International Criminal Court....National sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue. Eventually a world federation can be formally adopted with little resistance.”

1994 - April 14: Americans are killed as a result of a “friendly fire” attack while patrolling over Iraq, and Vice President Al Gore will refer to them as “those who died in the service of the United Nations.” !!!!!????? Let that sink in!

1994 - May 3: President Clinton signs Presidential Decision Directive 25, which strengthens the U.N. and describes how American soldiers will serve under foreign commanders. PDD25 will only be released to top administration officials and a few member of Congress, the general public is refused access.

1994 - the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor March 1995 quotes Vladimir Zhirinovsky on Nov 9 at a press conference at the U.N. said, “There has long been a hidden agenda to merge America and Russia under the New World Order.”

1995 - Jan 27: Billionaire financier George Soros at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, says the world needs a “new world order,” and he further warns: “I am here to alert you that we are entering a period of world disorder.”

1995 - The report, “Our Global Neighborhood,” by The Commission on Global Governance (partly funded by the U.N. Development Program and endorsed by the U.N. Secretary-General) is released, and states: “A new world order must be organized....Global governance is the way we manage global affairs....nations have to accept that in certain fields, sovereignty has to be exercised collectively....We need to accept that there may be circumstances within countries when the security of people is so severely violated that external intervention becomes justified. We propose that the U.N. Charter be amended to permit intervention in such circumstances....We believe that there is a need for a highly trained U.N. Volunteer (military) Force....Accelerated progress must be made toward demilitarizing the international society...We strongly endorse community initiatives to ...encourage the disarming of civilians....

1996 - Jan 24: U.S. Army Specialist Michael New is convicted at a court-martial on a charge of refusing an order to wear a U.N. insignia.

1996 - A Reporter's Life by Walter Cronkite is published, in which he proclaims: “if we are to avoid catastrophe, a system of world order--preferably a system of world government --is mandatory. The proud nations someday will ....yield up their precious sovereignty.”

1996 - May 11 Journalist Joan Veon interviews David C. Korten, author of When Corporations Rule the World (1995) and former Ford Foundation project specialist in Manila. In this interview, Korten claims that: “the World Trade Organization is creating a world government in which one organization which is totally unelected, wholly secretive....with the power to virtually override and local or national laws if those in any way inconvenience global corporations....It was a terrible shock (to those of us who supported Bill Clinton) when Clinton came in and GATT and NAFTA became the centerpieces of his policy....And in a sense, there was almost a seamless transition from President Bush to President Clinton in that regard....Our democracy has been rendered meaningless by big money. The truth is there are politicians (who) are owned lock, stock and barrel by the big money interests....Our elections create, to some extent, a facade of choice.”

1996 - October 23: On “The Charlie Rose Show” on the Public Broadcasting System, Mikhail Gorbachev states: “We are part of the Cosmos. Cosmos is my God. Nature is my God....The future society will be a totally new civilization which will synthesize the experience of Socialism and Capitalism....”

1998 - May 5: The New York Times publishes “The New World Order” by A. M. Rosenthal, in which he writes: “The U.S., its democratic allies and major dictatorships are rapidly building a new world order....The U.S. gets to sell strategic material to China, offering as an extra a visit by the U.S. President to honor the Communist leaders and expand their power and political life span. Religious and political mavericks in the totalitarian partners of the new world order get prison, or death, often both. The press of the democracies gets to write about the growth of order in the new order. Other citizens of the democracies get to say costs of imported goods are down, how nice. Americans and Europeans may come to object for political or moral reasons, or because the new world order may after all cost

2001 - “There is a chance for the President of the United States to use this (9-11) disaster to carry out ... a new world order.” (Gary Hart, at a televised meting organized by the CFR in Washington, D.C. Sept 14.) SELECTED WARNINGS ABOUT A 'NEW WORLD ORDER' from the founder of The John Birch Society, Robert Welch, and published in the Society's Bulletin:

1972 - May, page 10 “Or, as fellow Insider Mr. James Reston of the New York Times enthusiastically puts it, deliberately using the two-hundred years old language and slogan of the Conspiracy -- 'Mr. Nixon cannot become the head of a new world order (Novus Ordo Seclorum) unless the Communist nations are brought into the world order....' “

1972 - Sept, page 29 “This plan is to establish -- very soon -- the first stages of a 'new world order.' This will be the novus ordo seclorum for which a self-perpetuating inner circle of Conspirators has been working and scheming relentlessly during some six generations....”

1972 - Oct, page 28 “There should be no surprise for longtime readers of the Bulletin....that those plans include the conversion of the United States into a socialist nation....and the merger of that enslaved segment of mankind with other Communist nations into a New World Order. That goal, under that very name -- originally written in bastardized Latin as novus ordo seclorum -- has been envisioned by a Master Conspiracy for the past two hundred years as the ultimate product of all its crimes against humanity, and of all its subversive onslaughts against western civilization.”

Kennedy and the Press
Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961
A Warning of Subversion by Enemies Foreign and Domestic!

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.

You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession. You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx. We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”

But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.

If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight “The President and the Press.” Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded “The President Versus the Press.” But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family. If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm. On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did. It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one's golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors. I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; [Bay of Pigs, April 15, 1961 a CIA assault upon Cuba without Presidential knowledge or approval, that JFK took the hit for but refused the CIA air power] but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future--for reducing this threat or living with it--there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security--a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night [Bay of Pigs] instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. [Deep State] Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion. For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money. The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said--and your newspapers have constantly said--that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal. I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all. Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of the national security?” And I hope that every group in America--unions and businessmen and public officials at every level-- will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests. And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations. Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them. Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no Republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion. This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nation’s first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.

• Devolution the Only Solution – www.NationalLibertyAlliance.org/Devolution
• America Freedom to Fascism – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/america-freedom-fascism
• G. Edward Griffin Documentaries – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/g-edward-griffin
• JFK Secret Societies and the Coup D`Etat – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/jfk
• Money Masters – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/money
• Poison in Our Food, Air, and Water – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/poison
• Secret Meeting – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/secret-congressional-meeting
• Architects 911 reports – www.nationallibertyalliance.org/architects-news-911-reports