Disclaimers

Hello. I am trying to figure this all out. Both myself and my parents have completed the paperwork to come home to land and soil by claiming our birth name and I guess we are now American Nationals. Have we put ourselves in danger? We have not signed any member agreements or contracts of any kind nor will do anything else until I fully understand any and all implications of our actions. I did not come across this site until after completing that process but last night found a page by a previous Assembly Member that showed great concern to me regarding the need to understand "Jural Assemblies".  The person adamently terminates any prior support towards formation of Jural Assembly and urges readers to understand how supporting such can implicate them in a negative way. I am seriously concerned of how claiming our birthright name may have jeopardized myself and my parents. If anybody can set my mind at ease, I would sincerely appreciate it. 

I have just finished reading Anna von Reiz reply and I have to say that I am not educated enough to know whether what she states is correct. Perhaps we need to look into the "Michigan General Jural Society formed over twenty years ago and organized the
unincorporated State of Michigan and continues to properly operate the County and
State Jural Societies to this day. Their members, unlike yours, have properly
declared their political status and settled their counties on the land and taken their
Jural Oaths." I think that we need to have a serious discussion about terminology also because the words used have a certain connotations i.e "NOT "sovereign citizens"---- that
is an oxymoron, for one cannot act as a sovereign and a citizen at the same time nor
in the same jurisdiction, but sovereign on the land jurisdiction of this country nonetheless." and this is a major point . "And if the county level Grand Juries are not
properly seated and composed of people who have reclaimed and reconveyed their
names and estates to the land jurisdiction and organized Jural Societies and taken
their Jural Oaths---- then obviously, any state level Grand Juries are not validly
composed, either, and neither would a national level Grand Jury resulting from a
promulgation of smaller errors be valid." I may be wrong but I think this issue warrens a discussion John and Bernard. We are all trying our best and at the same time if by lack of background knowledge we have been really not quite on the right track we better fix it now. I do think everyone on the committees should read her answer to John so what she poses can be validated or ignored. Or some of it validated if it is useful. I think in the end we are about doing what is the right thing at this critical time, and not "be know it all's" and do things just because this is what we know. this is definitely a time to put our egos out of the way and do things for the greater good of all. Food for thought. Continued Wisdom, Love and Light

The only thing you did not address is Anna posting one of our documents on her site #49 our Writ of Quo Warranto http://www.annavonreitz.com/. Glad to clarify the whole thing. I have read a great deal of her writings, they are very educational and informative. Is everything of the historic information she writes true? I hope so. It definitely allows us to see the "government" in a different light. So when we talk about not overturning the "GOVERNMENT' which one are we speaking about.? According to the latest corporate entity UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. or something to that effect, that is a corporation, and we have been managed by corporations ever since 1871 when we lost our congressional quorum when the South walked out of Congress, forcing Lincoln to Incorporate, and the "congress" become a board of directors. Re writing the Constitution, and during the Civil War establishing Marshal Law that was never rescinded, and continues to be renewed even today by that fake congress. So we have not had a Constitutional government 140 years so what government are we actually overthrowing John? That is the tricky question. And when we file our papers with the Federal Court that is a fictional Maritime Law entity of a fictional government of a corporation who are we addressing? It is a conundrum, and re establishing our Republic based on the original Constitution is really what it is all about. Don't mean to make waves , just pose provocative thoughts. They are important because of the present situation, and the global situation. Much Wisdom Love and Light to all.

When I was a kid there was a ventriloquist on a variety show, I don’t remember which, and he would use his dummy to ingeniously engage the audience. It had eyebrows that would move, its eyes could blink independently, and it could tilt its head. It took on incredible simulations of human behaviors and even demonstrated human realistic mannerisms, to the point that it SEEMED the dummy was acting on its own. Eventually the audience no longer saw the ventriloquist, but only the dummy, and completely transfers to the audience a belief the dummy is for real.

Anna has mimicked John for so long, actually emulating our Common Law Grand Jury idea, uses our seals, and copies our documents, and in John’s failure to retort as the true ventriloquist, has transferred ALL NLA originality stolen by Anna, the dummy in this case. So my question for you is a good one:

When the show is over, and the audience is clapping, who are they clapping for, the ventriloquist or the dummy?

In this case, the Dummy wants to race ahead, strike out on its own, with its own interpretations, which are actually corruptions of the ventriloquist’s plan. The ventriloquist (John) wants to stay our course which does not give the dummy any original life or independent credibility. John used his response to figuratively raise his hands as the ventriloquist and demonstrate that it is NOT his hands controlling this dummy, and that he does not approve of what Anna, the dummy, is doing and wants to duly warn you.

Gary,

I believe I have been deceived by Anna von Rietz.

And I do apologize and beg forgiveness.

I also have posted many of her writings and now feel foolish.

I must admit that I thought I was starting to understand her positions as valid? And also thought she was working with the NLA?

I filed  a letter 1-30-15 to the IRS referencing 26USC6013 invoking my Common Law Rights preserved by UCC 1-308 And  1-106.6 Stated in 26USC 6013 now serve any further presumption and or relationship with the IRS and or Internal Revenue Service and now revoke election to pa yeas of June 30th 1973

Signed in red {Name Omitted} finger printed in red  under which non-negotiable autograph,under seal and in service,all rights reserved /with family Coat of Arms/ Notarized sent register read receipt mail to {Address omitted}

I believe it was an Anna letter? Am I in any danger of arrest?

NLA Answer to this member:

I am mistaken and have to ammend my recommendation to you:

I just spoke with John and Gerard, with another expert visiting on our call, and I brought up your issue. It came highly recommended that you need to send a letter to the IRS and rescind your letter filed to them. If you have further question please let me know.

There has been mixed reaction to this response from John to Anna. A majority are grateful that after about 2 years John has finally responded and provided retort for each of her claims. Some felt that our silence validated these negative and inflammatory accusations. 

First, thank you for the massive support. Second, this is the FIRST response to any blandishment leveled by Anna’s movement against John personally or the NLA plan as a whole.

I would like to answer to some questions in the responses.

1.       This is NOT only about Anna, but who and what she represents. The concepts of her movement are a significant departure from the NLA Plan, and a dangerous one also. John has clearly and concisely explained these deviations in his response to Anna. For example:

a.       There are no judges in a common law court

b.      It is not necessary to rewrite the constitution to restore the republic. We simply need to follow it.

c.       We will not participate in creating a shadow government, electing Governors, Presidents, Sheriffs, Judges, etc….

No one has been arrested in the performance of NLA duties and we plan on keeping it that way.

John. I hope that you do read this after I email it to you in an attachment for it will be too long for the comment section. I have used my investigative skills to break down each paragraph of Anna's article. I numbered each paragraph for reference. Here is my comments on paragraph #15. "Very misleading for it is NOT the job of the CLGJ's, of 25, to investigate anything. It is the job of the four Administrators to do the boots on the ground investigations and to submit the findings to the CLGJ's for a presentment or indictment of an individual (s) if the four can not make that decision. I should also add that once an indictment is thought, the party in question will then be granted the right to a petit trial jury of 12". I will try to get the full report by Monday.

I can't seem to find where or when congress passed this code. Is there any record of congress being in session when these codes were passed?

So glad to see a response. Am not sure how one can declare themselves a judge! God bless!

Mr. Darash,
I too use a pseudonym and for obvious reasons. In spite of what might seem an attack, it will settle much in the minds of those who feel this organization is the direction for this nation and any questions that might arise concerning these attacks.
Ms. Von Reitz is jealous. And that is my take on her.
She can't get her wings ready to fly and the next best thing is to try and clip someone else's.
Truth will out.
It must, our nation hangs in the balance.

Sincerely,
TheCountess